As a starting note, if we are indeed in “The Turn” then am I am fairly confident that I will be the only economist to have correctly called in real time all the following:
- Start of the Recession: I announced in Jan of 08 “The US is now in recession” missing NBER by one month
- The Global Financial Crisis: I predicted a looming “Japanese scenario” in early 2008
- The end of the Recession: I announced in July of 2009: “The US is no longer in recession” hitting NBER on the nose.
- The Turn: I predicted a pick-up beginning in autos and spreading to multifamily and the rest of the economy in the Summer of 2011.
Now to the data.
The obvious releases. ADP forecasts roughly 325K new private sector jobs in Dec., which if it holds under revision would make it the strongest ADP report ever.

New Claims for Unemployment Insurance falling to 372K, well into growth territory.
Here there has been much talk about the Seasonal Adjustment so lets just glance at the Non Adjusted Numbers.
Here is the last 10 years

Now here is the last year plus, that will be a little more helpful in seeing the seasonal patterns.

The mini-spike we just passed corresponds to the first mini spike on the left. As you can see we are about 50K below it.
Perhaps more promising is that the huge spike on the left should be occurring for us starting this week and peaking two weeks from now. We’d have to add an additional nearly 300K new filing to meet that peak and we are not nearly on pace to do that.
This means its likely that the we will be well ahead of last year in terms of new claims. Finally, we can look at raw year over year change to get a sense of the pace of the fall.

We are running about 40K clams les than a year ago, which at this level is a bit more than a 10% improvement.
We also got some descent news out Challenger and Grey though that rarely update my priors very much. Its not bad data, it just doesn’t contain much new information.
What I really care about is the RIES data. This is what matters. All this other junk is ultimately backwards looking. I want to know what the marginal productivity of capital in the United States is and the potential for investment going forward.
And, remember capital and buildings are largely two different words for the same thing. And, what do most of our buildings do? They are a place where families sleep and eat breakfast.
RIES has data on apartment vacancies:

Straight down like a bullet.
Not only are we likely to see an increase in the number of folks looking for an apartment this year, but we will have a record – yes record – low number of new apartment buildings coming online this year.
I need to spend some quality time with this data series but I am pretty sure that we can be confident that 2012 will give us the tightest year of apartment vacancies in recorded history. Yes, the tightest year in recorded history.
I will see how much time I can devote to this data over the weekend and give an update next week.
This in turn means higher rents.
Higher rents do several things.
1) They make building new complexes more profitable and importantly an easier sell to the bank. I should do a whole post on this, but there is this important phenomenon where its very hard to sell a bank on the potential of low vacancies but very easy to sell the bank on actual low vacancies.
I think this stems from the fact that its always in the borrowers interest to lie. In any case what it means is that for financing reasons you can have big overshoots in massive construction projects like offices and apartment building. Too few before the boom, too many afterwards. We are in the way too few stage.
2) This make single family rental conversion more profitable. I was actually in this business for a while. It’s a pain in the ass. It really is. You can see why almost all single family is owner-occupied. However, there are times when the profits are just too juicy to pass up.
There are times when the current rent – current rent – will pay your mortgage, taxes, insurance, maintenance plus a buffer on a property This means you need no rent increases to make this deal work and the property could literally be worthless when the mortgage is up and you still would have made money.
You can’t walk away from it. Investors won’t walk away from that. Its too juicy. Even if it does mean 4am calls about a domestic dispute that wound up smashing your windows and now the kids are freezing.
3) They make buying make more sense. Folks have to live somewhere. You look at rents and they are screaming higher. Then you look at a potential mortgage lots of young couples will say – who cares about the property value – the mortgage alone makes it worth it.
Don’t underestimate the ability of wide-eyed young couples to do this. I had a family member just buy a home in what we affectionately call “the hood.” Her and her husband have solidly middle class jobs. The mortgage, however, was lower than their rent. When you are young and feel like you can handle the neighborhood, whether it is full of foreclosed homes or folks engaging in off-label pharmaceutical sales, you will take it.
All of those things are positive for recovery.
What we really are looking for now though are multifamily starts. Apartment buildings. I am not calling for a million SAAR on multifamily, but I am already saying that this is not crazy. And, it would represent a transformative boom.
A boom that will not only pull America out of the slump but change the way our cities look. If our cities will have them. I’ll outsource that conversation to Ryan Avent and Matt Yglesias.

15 comments
Comments feed for this article
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Avo
How is economics a science if you are the only economist who could correctly interpret the data?
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
Karl Smith
I don’t know if predicting the uncontrolled future is the mark of a science.
Ultimately I think that everything that happens is government by the laws of physics but we do not have many physics models that can predict the uncontrolled future.
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 10:42 pm
Gene Callahan
Right. Forecasting is an art, a matter of feel and intuition, and not a science.
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 12:50 pm
Andy Harless
You undersell yourself. The business cycle peak was December 2007. We weren’t “in” a recession until January, so you hit it right on the nose. (It would have been even more impressive, I suppose, to have said, “We will be in a recession by the end of this month,” but it’s hard to imagine how anyone could have done that other than by random chance.)
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 1:59 pm
Thursday links: paused portfolios | Abnormal Returns
[…] No wonder multi-family home building is on the rise. (Calculated Risk, Modeled Behavior) […]
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Checking In on the Rental Boom
[…] Karl Smith explains why high rents matter: 1) They make building new complexes more profitable and importantly an easier sell to the bank. I should do a whole post on this, but there is this important phenomenon where its very hard to sell a bank on the potential of low vacancies but very easy to sell the bank on actual low vacancies… […]
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 4:19 pm
Curt Doolittle
Karl is the best blogging economist out there. And we’re lucky that he spends his time with us.
Now if I could just get him to understand politics….. 🙂
Thursday ~ January 5th, 2012 at 10:03 pm
Thursday links: paused portfolios
[…] No wonder multi-family home building is on the rise. (Calculated Risk, Modeled Behavior) […]
Sunday ~ January 8th, 2012 at 9:49 am
George
The claims that you start your column with should be backed up by links that give evidence. You aren’t the only person in the world claiming that you predicted the past.
Sunday ~ January 8th, 2012 at 10:26 am
Why The Plunge In Apartment Vacancies Is A Really Big Deal « InvestmentWatch
[…] Karl Smith at Modeled Behavior has a great post about the inevitable upward pressure on rents, and what higher rents mean for the economy. […]
Sunday ~ January 8th, 2012 at 11:02 am
H.J. Huney
I’ve been expecting this for awhile. My generation, by and large, doesn’t want to live in deep exurban places where we have to endure miserable time-draining commutes every day. We definitely have a more urban disposition than the prior generation. So this is not only about the housing crash, but also a generational shift in preferences, as well.
Which, btw, housing crashes often seem to coincide with generational or demographic shifts — Japan’s bubble crashed just as their population boom began to reverse — which further exacerbated it, as there was no new demand to fill the vast excess of supply. Same deal here, in a sense, however, it’s less demographic and more a preference. There’s so much deep exurban supply, we’ll probably have an overhang for another decade or more. But what a loot of gloom-and-doomers haven’t understood very well: in spite of the vast overhang in some areas, we’re actually undersupplied in the areas where younger people want to live.
This is why I’ve been so bullish on the homebuilders over the past several months:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/288744-housing-will-rebound-stronger-than-expected
People don’t realize just how much that industry is changing. Toll Brothers is actually make high-rise condos now and making a lot of money doing it. That was unheard of for a large homebuilder a decade ago!
In any case, great blog. Thanks for this!
Sunday ~ January 8th, 2012 at 11:26 am
Why The Plunge In Apartment Vacancies Is A Really Big Deal – Finding Out About
[…] Karl Smith at Modeled Behavior has a great post about the inevitable upward pressure on rents, and what higher rents mean for the economy. […]
Sunday ~ January 8th, 2012 at 1:01 pm
Why The Plunge In Apartment Vacancies Is A Really Big Deal | Athens Report
[…] Karl Smith at Modeled Behavior has a great post about the inevitable upward pressure on rents, and what higher rents mean for the economy. […]
Thursday ~ January 12th, 2012 at 6:05 pm
Econ blogs at Tobias Buckell Online
[…] at Modeled Behavior, Karl Smith takes a look at the fundamentals of the economy for the US starting this […]
Thursday ~ January 12th, 2012 at 6:05 pm
Econ blogs at Tobias Buckell Online
[…] at Modeled Behavior, Karl Smith takes a look at the fundamentals of the economy for the US starting this […]