I define the simplified version of the Sumner Critique as follows: If the Central Bank is targeting Nominal GDP precisely then all other macroeconomic effects become classical in nature.
This is obviously an extreme position as it requires not just omnipotence but omniscience and for lack of a better term omnibenevolence on the part of the Central Bank.
A useful way to interject the Sumner Critique into all of our reasoning, however, is simply to ask what the Central Bank Multiplier (CBM) is.
So, do your analysis in whatever framework you prefer and then when you get to the end attach a CBM to all of your final estimates. Under Scott Sumner’s vision the CBM for all aggregate demand moves is zero.
Thus if you imagine that the Fiscal Cliff for example will subtract 4% from GDP then you apply a CBM of 0 and you get that the Fiscal Cliff will subtract 0% from GDP or will have no net effect.
A less extreme version might place the CBM a .5, so that your traditional analysis says that the fiscal cliff subtracts 4% but after applying the CBM you get 2%.
Now, to be sure there will not be a single the “CBM.” We don’t want to get trapped in that intellectual cul-de-sac again.
The CBM you use will not only depend on the nature of your thought experiment but the framework that you used in the first place to get your original estimate. If you included no type of monetary feedback then the CBM will be larger smaller.
The CBM concept also allows us to usefully go all the way back to IS-LM. Since we are going to apply monetary reaction at the end we don’t need it in the base model.
I also suspect, but it would require some work, that just about everything that you would want in an inter-temporal model can either be collapsed into assumptions about the way the IS curve responds to expectations or into the CBM.
I don’t think you need any other explicit inter-temporal modeling. The simple reason is that periods in time must either “push-on” each other ether through their effects on real goods and services which will show up in the IS curve or through inter-temporal prices, which will be collapsed into the CBM. In short the CBM works by manipulating intertemporal prices so as to achieve the effect the central bank wants.
So, from an outside perspective it doesn’t matter what agents think inter-temporal prices will be, the CBM will force them to be what they need to be to make the CBM work.
That does of course mean that you have to do a lot of thinking when trying to figure out what the CBM will be, but once you have done that you don’t need to carry the baggage around with you everywhere. Just do the simple statics with real expectations imbedded in IS and then apply the CBM.
15 comments
Comments feed for this article
Friday ~ May 18th, 2012 at 11:03 am
TheMoneyIllusion » The NKs win when only the RBC model is left standing
[…] Karl Smith starts off a new post as follows: I define the simplified version of the Sumner Critique as follows: If the Central Bank is targeting Nominal GDP precisely then all other macroeconomic effects become classical in nature. […]
Friday ~ May 18th, 2012 at 11:33 am
Assorted Links « azmytheconomics
[…] The Sumner Critique. I find that this way of thinking is a fantastic way to simplify thinking. Of course, later […]
Saturday ~ May 19th, 2012 at 3:33 pm
daniel
Would it be possible for the cbm to be a product of a game played out between the central bank and the markets. As if a man standing in the center of a stadium holds up a number and every person in the stands must revise their “number”. This constant revising would then find its equilibrium on the cbm. I probably screwed that up but its how i view market monetarism.
Friday ~ May 25th, 2012 at 6:38 am
Newsflash for Jonathan Portes: The MPC Are Targeting Inflation « uneconomical
[…] apply the Sumner Critique, and presume that the MPC will prevent the CPI rate raising much faster or much slower than 2%, […]
Tuesday ~ May 29th, 2012 at 12:58 pm
Unlearningecon
Just to note that this isn’t original – Keynes said that when his policies were applied, and full employment reached, the economy would become classical in nature.
Wednesday ~ May 30th, 2012 at 7:20 am
Mervyn King and the Fiscal Multiplier « uneconomical
[…] – the Sumner Critique reduced to a single verb. (MPC Kremlinologists might pick up on the use of the word […]
Thursday ~ May 31st, 2012 at 10:36 am
The ‘Sumner Critique’, or Why Not to Ignore Keynes « Unlearning Economics
[…] a brief note on Scott Sumner’s latest offering to the field of economics – the ‘Sumner Critique‘. Sumner offers an apt example of why macroeconomists who ignore TGT are basically wasting […]
Sunday ~ March 17th, 2013 at 1:47 pm
test website
I very lucky to find this site on bing, just what I was looking for likewise saved to favorites.
Tuesday ~ April 23rd, 2013 at 3:19 pm
Shale Boom is Real Enough | NewsCred Plugin For WPMU
[…] means a multiplier of two is certainly not crazy and probably modest, even in light of the Sumner Critique. Then we are looking at 1.2 percentage points or a counterfactual unemployment rate of 8.3%. […]
Tuesday ~ April 23rd, 2013 at 3:27 pm
Shale Boom is Real Enough | Business
[…] means a multiplier of two is certainly not crazy and probably modest, even in light of the Sumner Critique. Then we are looking at 1.2 percentage points or a counterfactual unemployment rate of 8.3%. […]
Thursday ~ August 1st, 2013 at 9:47 am
A simple model demonstrating the Sumner critique | Basil Halperin
[…] opinion, is the “Sumner critique.” This critique named after Scott Sumner has been worded many different ways, but I would state it like […]
Thursday ~ November 28th, 2013 at 4:44 am
nike tn requin
As of last month,(MARISA ACOCELLA MARCHETTO / Pantheon – .Marchetto is a breast-cancer survivor who turned her experience into the excellent 2006 memoir of a graphic novel.
Wednesday ~ September 24th, 2014 at 12:41 am
canada goose winter jackets
http://www.cakesofgoodtaste.co.uk/europe/canada-goose-store.html canada goose store
Wednesday ~ September 24th, 2014 at 12:41 am
canada goose parka for sale
http://www.samsi.co.uk/coats/uk-moncler.html uk moncler
Thursday ~ February 2nd, 2017 at 1:54 pm
Unlearning Econ Points out Sumner’s Ignorance on Keynes
[…] I’d offer a brief note on Scott Sumner’s latest offering to the field of economics – the ‘Sumner Critique.’ Sumner offers an apt example of why macroeconomists who ignore TGT are basically wasting their […]